Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Harry Strawbridge's avatar

he Nation article comparing Mangione's murder of the United Healthcare exec with Daniel Penny's effort to protect himself and others from a deranged person on the subway, I submit that by any objective standard there exists absolutely no correlation. One case involved a premeditated, carefully planned, self-sanctioned execution of a perfect stranger in the total absence of any sort clear and present threat or danger. The other was an effort to protect self and others from a person acting in a threRegarding tatening manner and loudly proclaiming that "someone is going to die" in a subway car, from which quick escape was impossible. Further, the method used to subdue the threat was not meant to be lethal, unlike the bullets to the back Mangione used to commit senseless murder.

So Mangione brutally murdered his victim based on purely subjective ideological motives. In contrast, Penny, and another passenger, not charged to my knowledge for his participation, stepped up to subdue a very aggressive, clearly deranged person making credible threats against the lives of all the passengers in that subway car. To mitigate the threat, he had to be subdued until the car stopped at the next station and he could be turned over to authorities. He unfortunately died in the interim as an unintended consequence of the restraint applied to safeguard the well-being of many others. Unlike Mangione, Penny did not arrive at the scene with intent to kill. Unlike Penny, Mangione's action had zero chance of saving anyone from any sort of harm. Unlike Mangione, Penny did not try to evade the authorities, which speaks to the fact that his conscience was clear, and Mangione's was not. The obvious conclusion about the Nation article is that it is nothing more than typical leftist nonsense, claptrap designed to be an attack on anyone who refuses to subjugate their mind and body totally to the "authority" of the gov't and those at its levers of power. Adherents to this cult of total gov't are so dependent and personally helpless that they believe that we should (and have) completely delegated to gov't

our right to personally defend our very lives under any circumstances! The lunacy of that position cannot be overstated. The Nation article is useful only in that it illustrates the abject idiocy of leftist "thought". Pure, smelly, sticky, slippery B.S., nothing more.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts